|
|
Bible Interpretation I
Lesson Two
|
Listen: |
Download: |
MP3
(Part 1) |
X (Part
1) (Right Click and Save as) |
MP3
(Part 2) |
X
(Part
2) (Right Click and Save as) |
Introduction Continued
Printable
Version Coming Soon
-
Major
Approaches to Bible Interpretation
-
Allegorical
-
Scripture
is spiritualized so that its primary message is taken to be something
other than what it plainly says.
-
This
is the approach of religious scholarship
-
Traditional
-
Scripture
is made to conform to earlier traditional teachings of the accepted
church
-
This
is the approach of church hierarchy
-
Rationalistic
-
Scripture
is treated as any other book (uninspired and error-ridden) and is analyzed
for errors more than believed for truth
-
This
is the approach of humanistic scholarship
-
Literal
-
Scripture
is taken to mean what it says. Even symbols and types refer to
that which is literal.
-
This
is the approach of Bible believers
-
Importance
of Approach
-
Man
cannot find value in the Bible until he understands what it means (Acts
8:30-31)
-
Man’s
method of interpretation determines whether or not he understands the
Bible
-
Therefore,
without correct interpretation of the Bible, man is blinded from the
truth of the word of God
-
BRIEF
HISTORY OF BIBLE INTERPRETATION
-
Apostolic
Age (0-150AD)
-
Life
span of those who knew the apostles (Judges
2:7)
-
Literal
interpretation was predominate
-
Early
Church Age (150-500AD); three main directions of interpretation developed
-
Literal
-
Centered
in the school of Antioch
-
Predominate
in Syria and Asia Minor
-
Continued in the pattern set
by the apostles
-
Allegorical
-
Centered
in the school of Alexandria
-
Predominate
in Egypt and Palestine
-
Main
proponents: Origen and Eusebius
-
Approach
first developed by the Jewish theologian, Philo
-
Traditional
-
Centered
in the school of Rome
-
Predominate
in Italy and North Africa
-
Main
proponents: Augustine and Jerome; Augustine “laid down the rule that
the Bible must be interpreted with reference to Church Orthodoxy” – Farrar
-
Joined
forces with the school of Alexandria to establish the doctrine of the
Roman Catholic Church
-
Middle
Ages (500-1500AD)
-
Traditional
interpretation as found in Roman Catholicism predominated; Hugo of
St. Victor said, “Learn first what you should believe, and then go
to the Bible to find it there.”
-
Allegorical
interpretation used only as it served tradition
-
Small
pockets of Bible believers throughout Europe held to literal interpretation
-
Reformation
(1500-1700AD)
-
Return
to literal interpretation brought revival, evangelism and increased
Bible study
-
Traditional
views remained solid in Roman Catholicism and were never completely
erased in the Protestant denominations
-
With
the increase of education, the seed was planted for allegoricalism
and rationalism
-
Reformation
teaching established the threefold foundation of Bible interpretation
-
Grammatical
interpretation – Interpretation must take into account the actual words
of the passage including vocabulary, grammar and immediate context
-
Historical
interpretation – Scripture must be studied in the context of its relationship
to history, geography and customs
-
Doctrinal
interpretation – Any doctrinal passage must be studied as it relates
to those same doctrines as taught throughout the entire Bible; This
involves scriptural comparison, doctrinal development and dispensational
differences
-
Modern
Church Age (1700AD to present)
-
Through
scholarship, allegoricalism and rationalism predominate
-
Traditionalism
continues its hold on Roman Catholicism and mainline Protestantism
-
Literalism
becomes more and more uncommon as does Bible study, revivals and solid
churches
Take
Quiz
Bible
Interpretation Index Lesson
Three
|
|
|