Open the
Bible Question Form to send your own question.
In describing the
temple that King Solomon built for the King of Kings, several articles
of furniture are described. One of these pieces is a “a molten sea.”
2Chronicles 4:2 reads thus, “Also he made a molten sea of ten cubits
from brim to brim, round in compass, and five cubits the height thereof;
and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.”
A supposed
discrepancy has arisen from this passage concerning the mathematical
accuracy of the Bible. The value of π (pi) is known to be equal to the
circumference of a circle divided by its diameter.
The aforementioned
scripture states that the molten sea was “ten cubits from brim to brim” and
“a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about;” thus, its diameter
was 10 cubits, and its circumference 30 cubits. Dividing this circumference
of 30 by a diameter of 10 gives a value of exactly 3. This is where
the questions arise. It is commonly known that the value of π is
approximately 3.14159265358979. In fact, this value has been proven so
exactly, that its value is known to hundreds of thousands of digits.
Why then does the
Bible appear to give the value of π to be 3? A diameter
of 10 cubits should yield a circle having a circumference of more that
31.4 cubits--not 30 cubits. Is the Bible just rounding things
off? Are the Biblical values just approximate and not really
exact? If we see here that the scripture is not exact,
what other passages also contain words that cannot be received
with complete accuracy?
Let us examine the
passage more carefully. First, the Bible says that the molten
sea was “ten cubits from brim to brim.” This logically would
be from the very edge of the rim on one side to the very farthest point
on the opposite side.
Second, the same verse declares that “a line of thirty cubits did compass
it round about.” What is the antecedent of “it?” Clearly
it is the molten sea mentioned previously in the verse; therefore, the “line
of 30 cubits”
compasses the sea, or the liquid contained in the vessel. Taken
exactly as described, the measurement appears to be the inner
diameter of the basin--the distance around the sea.
When
we realize that this molten sea has a thickness associated with it,
the 10 cubits from brim to brim becomes the outer diameter, while the
30-cubit measurement describes the inner circumference. Since
the diameter is obtained by simply dividing the circumference by (pi),
the inner diameter can be calculated as 9.549 cubits. Additionally,
the thickness of the vessel is found by taking half of the difference
between the inner and outer diameter. Using the inner diameter just
calculated and the given outer diameter of 10 cubits, the thickness is
0.225 or approximately 4 inches.
Furthermore, verse
5 of the same chapter adds validity to this conjecture. “And
the thickness of it [the molten sea] was an handbreadth, and the brim
of it like the work of the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies, and
it received and held three thousand baths.” The outer brim was
ornamented with lilies; thus, the outer rim had a jagged-like shape,
and was not round like the inner rim. Henceforth, giving a dimension for the outside circumference would
not have much meaning. Additionally, verse 5 indicates
that the thickness of the vessel was “an handbreadth.” While the
exact length of the Biblical handbreadth differs according to various
scholars, it literally means the breadth of a hand, or approximately
3 to 4 inches--precisely the same thickness as previously calculated!
Consequently, while
this appears to be a straightforward error, a careful examination of
the Biblical wording along with some common sense confirms that the
Word of God is, in fact, infallible.