Open the
Bible Question Form to send your own question.
Q:
Regarding foreknowledge, I find
it inconceivable and impossible to explain how, according to
the traditional doctrine of God's foreknowledge, God can
know from the beginning who will be saved and who will not
be saved while at the same time both of the latter have a
free will in choosing their destiny. I'm open to hearing
someone else explain this but after 25 years of trying to
come to a Biblical and logical answer, I find none. Perhaps
you can help?
A
: Thank you for your question. It is a question
that has puzzled many and I cannot guarantee that I can
bring any satisfaction. In fact, if you have been seeking
for an answer for 25 years, I have to admit I have little
hope of satisfying your puzzlement. However, that has not
stopped me before. I will try my best to help. If it does
not, then at least I have tried.
First, let us establish two definitions and then try to
determine the possible relationships between these two
ideas. Since we have to begin somewhere, I will use my own
definitions. The two words are foreknowledge and
foreordination. I define foreknowledge as God’s perfect
knowledge of the future. I will define foreordination as
God’s ordering of future events so that they are absolutely
determined by His will. Even if you disagree with my
definitions, this will give us a basis for discussing the
subject.
The problem many have is how foreknowledge can be
absolute while foreordination is not (thus allowing for a
level of free will). The thinking, if I understand it
correctly, goes like this. For an illustration, let's
imagine a man who we will call John and then give him a
decision to make. For the sake of simplicity, we will say
that he only has two possible choices which we will label
choice A and choice B. John has no idea which he will choose
but feels inwardly that he has complete power over the
choice and can freely choose either A or B. However, God
because of His foreknowledge already knows what choice John
will make. He knows that John will in the end choose B. This
is absolute knowledge and it will definitely happen. So,
does John have a free will to choose either A or B as he
feels or is he predetermined to choose B no matter what
since this is what God knows will indeed happen? That is, is
John foreordained to do what God knows he will do? This is a
truly difficult problem. However, before we finish with
John, let's consider three possible relationships between
foreknowledge and foreordination.
- Some teach that God foreknows all future events
because He has foreordained all future events. In this
view, the two concepts cannot be separated. God’s
foreknowledge is the same as His foreordination. This
doctrine denies the reality of man’s free will and makes
salvation a matter of God’s arbitrary choice (called
unconditional election). Despite attempts to avoid this
by most proponents of this doctrine, it tends to
fatalism. In fact, it is difficult to escape fatalistic
conclusions if one equates foreknowledge with
foreordination and believes them both. Most who have
escaped it have done so by exercising the human ability
to hold on to two contradictory ideas in one mind at the
same time.
- Others now teach that God has not foreordained all
future events because He does not know all future
events. Much about the future is open and unknown. This
doctrine has been recently renewed and is called the
open view of God. It teaches that the future is open to
many possibilities—even in the mind of God. This
doctrine limits the greatness of God and is an attack on
His person as the absolute God. This is a dangerous
doctrine because the very integrity of God is based on
His perfect foreknowledge (Deuteronomy 18:18-22; Isaiah
41:21-23).
- Finally, others as myself teach that God foreknows
all future events but has not foreordained all future
events. This view accepts that there are many things
foreordained by God, but rejects that all things are
predetermined by the will of God. Foreknowledge and
foreordination are not the same in this view.
I believe that one of the problems we have with
distinguishing between foreknowledge and foreordination is
our inability to grasp the mind of God- and this is not
going to change. According to Isaiah 57:15, God inhabits
eternity. That is, He dwells outside of and above time in an
eternal state. Now, I cannot understand this but only accept
it as true biblical teaching. However, we also know that God
works in history; He deals with us in time. So, He inhabits
eternity on one hand and consecutively deals with His
creation in time. I cannot fully grasp this because these
thoughts are too high for me.
Therefore, God sees all of the events of history (past,
present, and future) in one full sweep (Deuteronomy
31:20-21; Isaiah 46:9-10; Acts 15:18).Yet, He allows man to
make many decisions on his own. Man has a free will to make
his own decisions. Now just one aside: man does not have a
totally uninhibited free will. I cannot will myself to be
President of the United States. No person can will
themselves to be a yard taller than they are. Our will is
fallen and often fails us. To will is present, but how to
perform is not there (Romans 7:18). Some have taken free
will far beyond its biblical proportions and have fallen
into their own errors.
My answer to the problem is that foreknowledge is not the
same as foreordination or predestination (Romans 8:29;
1Peter 1:2). Foreknowledge is not of itself causative. That
is, to know a future action is not the same as causing that
future action to happen. Therefore, foreknowledge is not to
be confused with the predetermined will of God. God does
have a predetermined will, but it does not determine every
action of created beings.
Let me illustrate. I have a level of foreknowledge. It is
extremely limited and sometimes faulty. However, it is the
closest I can came to the real thing and it will have to do
for purposes of illustration. What I mean is this: there are
times when I know what someone is going to do. I mean I know
it and I am seldom wrong when I know it. It is true that I
base my foreknowledge on past knowledge of this person's
actions. But it is still knowledge of what someone will do
before they do it. I am sure you have the same experience on
occasion. We know the ways of a wife, a child, or a friend
to such an extent that we know what they will do in many
cases. We know before they make their own decision and on
occasion we know before they know what they will do.
Now, let me ask you, does our foreknowledge of their
decision in any way affect the decision they make? Has our
foreknowledge removed their free will? I think not. To know
what decision someone will make is not the same as forcing
them to make that decision. From His eternal vantage point,
God knows what we are going to do and what will happen to us
in full. Some of these things He may even directly cause to
happen. However, as He works in time, He can also allow us
the freedom to make our own decisions in many cases (though
He knows what decision we will make). That does not require
a fatalistic control of all things in the universe. John,
from our earlier illustration, freely choose B as God from
His eternal view knew he would do.
God's ability to work in time while knowing all is truly
beyond our comprehension. Yet the Bible has examples of just
this trait in God. In Genesis 49:10, Jacob prophesies of the
tribe of Judah, "The sceptre shall not depart from Judah,
nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come."
That is, the ruling line of Israel that will lead to the
Messiah (Shiloh) will be through Judah. David was of the
line of Judah, but King Saul was of Benjamin. Evidently,
Saul is an aberration in the royal line, possibly caused by
the impatience of Israel to have a king.
But God has Samuel to say a strange thing to Saul in
1Samuel 13:13-14 -
"Thou hast done foolishly: thou hast not kept the
commandment of the LORD thy God, which he commanded
thee: for now would the LORD have established thy
kingdom upon Israel for ever. But now thy kingdom shall
not continue: the LORD hath sought him a man after his
own heart."
Do you see what he said? God would have established
Saul's kingdom upon Israel forever. How could God say this
when He knew that Saul would be and had to be replaced by a
man from the tribe of Judah? I believe that God has an
ability to act in time even though He knows all future
things in perfection. He does this in a way that we cannot
understand. It simply comes down to accepting everything God
says about Himself without altering what we do not
understand.
I truly hope that you can get some peace about this
puzzle. God does not want us to simply be puzzled. He wants
us to believe all that He says. May the Lord bless you in
your search for His truth.
Till He comes,
Pastor David Reagan