A:
There are two common views concerning
the length of the six days of creation as found in
Genesis One. One view says that the days are the same
basic 24-hour days that we have now. The second view is
that these are day-ages that refer to much longer
periods of time. The second opinion usually allows for
evolutionary forces to be the driving factor in the
creation of the plant and animal species. Proponents of
this approach note that the plants and animals in the
days of creation generally go from the less complex to
the more complex and in this general trend matches the
theory of evolution. I strongly believe that the days of
creation are 24-hour days. However, I want to carefully
look at the facts as found in scripture and science in
order to support this position.
Specifically, you ask only about the first day. Genesis
1:5 notes the end of this day with these words: "And the
evening and the morning were the first day." The same
pattern is used for the other five days of creation.
Genesis 1:31 states, "And the evening and the morning
were the sixth day." Since the exact same formula is
used for each of the days (not only this closing
statement but in the other elements as well), they must
be equal to one another. Therefore, what one is, the
others are.
Those who propose the day-age theory point out that the
Bible sometimes uses the word, day, as a reference to an
age or a large period of time. This is true but it does
not give the interpreter license to insert an age into
any place that the word, day, is used. The context of
the passage must demand it. It does not do so in Genesis
One.
One
reason the day-age theory does not work is found in the
word pattern that closes each day (as mentioned above).
Each point out that "the evening and the morning" were
that day. This is in accordance with Jewish reckoning.
According to the Hebrew concept of time, a day begins
with the evening when the sun goes down. This has been
generally identified as 6PM. Roman time switches to the
next day at midnight. Hebrew time does so when the day
(as in daylight) ends. The evening comes first and then
the morning. This kind of description only fits a
24-hour-day. It would make no sense if the day were
thousands or millions of years long.
The
proponents of theistic evolution (the idea that God gave
the original bump to creation but that evolution
explains most of the rest) like to point out the
similarities in order in the six-day creation with the
teachings of evolution. The earth is formed before life
appears on it (kind of a no- brainer). Plant life comes
before animal life. Sea creatures are created before
land creatures. Man is last. What they avoid are the
many dissimilarities and the outright contradictions to
evolutionary order.
For
instance, all vegetation is created (third day) before
the sun, moon, and stars (fourth day). How did
chlorophyll work for an entire age before the sun
existed? Vegetation is also created (third day) before
insects and birds (fifth day), but much vegetation
depends on these creatures for pollination. How did the
plants survive for two long ages without proper
pollination? In another example, all life in the sea
(fifth day) comes before the most basic life on land
(sixth day). Specifically mentioned as created on the
fifth day are the mammals that are whales (Genesis
1:21). These details and others do not fit the
evolutionary scheme at all.
In
the end, it comes down to whether or not someone
believes the Bible to be literally true. If the
transient opinions of science are are someone's true
authority but they are religious and want to make a
gesture towards the Bible, then they may latch on to
theistic evolution as a compromise. In this
scheme, the days of Genesis One must be changed to
day-ages and the text must be looked on as containing
some truth in a mythical way but in no way being an
exact account of truth. However, if one takes God's word
to be the final authority, the day's must be normal
days. Perhaps they were a few seconds longer than they
are today, but they were equivalent to our 24-hour days.
Thank you for the great question.
Till
He comes,
David F. Reagan