Open the
Bible Question Form to send your own question.
Q: What
is the difference in denominations and how do you know who is right? The
understanding that I get from the Bible is that we should all be
followers of our Lord Christ Jesus. So why do we add our own opinions of
what we get from scriptures and make it a denomination totally separate
from another group who claims to be following Christ also? Plus a non
denominational church is like a denomination in its self.
A: Denominations are
definitely with us and will certainly be with us until the
coming of Christ. Many people see denominations as an evil
in the world. Most who hate the idea of denominations go to
the prayer of Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane. In John
17:11, He prayed, "And now I am no more in the world, but
these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father,
keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me,
that they may be one, as we are." Therefore, if it was the
desire and prayer of Jesus that His followers be one, then
the divisions brought on by denominations must be evil. This
conviction has caused many to come up with ways to bring
about this oneness. Unfortunately, human devices that seek
to obtain God's almost always fail. Here are the main
contenders that seek to bring about this oneness.
-
One approach is to start
a group and then deny that it is a denomination. This is
the practice of the non-denominational movement, the
Churches of Christ, and others. But this approach ends
up being no more than a hoax. The verb, to denominate,
means to give a name to something in order to
distinguish it from other similar things. Therefore, as
soon as a group has a name that identifies them as a
group that is different in some ways from other groups,
they have become a denomination. To deny this is to deny
the obvious.
-
Another approach is to
attempt a joining of denominations in an ecumenical
movement. This has been the goal of the liberal churches
for decades. In fact, I think they will eventually
succeed. The bad news is that, when they do, what they
have will not be the true body of Christ but rather the
church of the antichrist. For the ecumenical movement to
work, churches have to be convinced that doctrinal
beliefs and church practices mean nothing and that
nothing is worth dividing over. However, this flies in
the face of New Testament teaching. Titus 3:10 states,
"A man that is an heretick after the first and second
admonition reject." We are not to allow heretics in the
church. But one church's heretic is another church's
orthodox believer.
-
A third approach
(similar to the second) is to accept the claim of Roman
Catholicism that they are the original and true church
and slowly merge back into the fold of the Catholic
Church. This is indeed where ecumenicalism will
eventually end. But there are those like myself who are
convinced that the Roman Catholic church left the truth
of God's Holy Word so many centuries ago that it cannot
be considered a church today.
I, and many other both like
me and quite different from me, cannot accept any of these
three choices. I am convinced that the churches cannot and
will not be united in any godly way by the efforts of man.
In fact, if you think about it, that is not what Jesus
prayed. Jesus prayed to the Father that they may be one.
This is evidently a work of God and not a work of man. Also,
it does not necessarily refer to outward titles or
denominational names. Jesus prayed: "Holy Father, keep
through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that
they may be one, as we are." Believers are one by the power
of the Father in keeping through His name those He has given
to the Son.
I believe that the
references in the gospel of John to those given by the
Father to the Son refer to the true saints of God who
believed in Him before the revelation of Jesus as the
Messiah. When Jesus came, the Father gave all who truly
believed in Him to the Son. That is, all of the true
believers in the Father accepted Jesus as the Messiah when
they were introduced to Him. This refers to Jewish
believers. But Jesus is praying not for "these alone, but
for them also which shall believe on me through their word"
(John 17:20). Many of these later believers would be
Gentiles. One of the most spectacular shifts in thought that
could have been imagined at the time of Jesus was that Jew
and Gentile could be made one in Christ, but this is exactly
what happened--in part as an answer to the prayer of Christ
in John 17. Ephesians 2:11-22 deals with this oneness in
Christ in great detail. Paul said concerning Jesus Christ:
"For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath
broken down the middle wall of partition between us"
(Ephesians 2:14). The "both" in context are Jew and Gentile.
In this, the prayer of Jesus in Gethsemane was truly
answered.
I would take this one more
step though. I share a true oneness with other believers in
Christ despite denominational names and variations in
doctrine. I have worked alongside true believers who went to
churches of other denominations. And although we did not
agree in every whit and did not change each other's mind on
our differences, we still shared a oneness that was not
shared with unbelievers. I would also say that those who
were lost did not notice so much our differences to each
other as they noticed our differences to them. Generally,
they tended to see us simply as Christians and the divide
they saw was between the believers and the unbelievers.
There are many ways in which the prayer of Christ is
answered at this time. It will be enough that we have to
wait for its final fulfillment through the direct working of
the Father.
So, why are there different
denominations? They are there because all men do not see the
same thing in the Bible. However, the problem is not with
the Bible but with men. Most denominations have a small
number of foundational approaches to truth or doctrinal
beliefs that they count as the base of truth for believers.
These foundational beliefs lead to most of the remainder of
their doctrines. For instance, Baptists give an extremely
high priority to the authority of the Word of God. However,
Baptists also believe very strongly in a dispensational
shift from the beginning of the apostolic age to the mature
practice of the Christians later in the apostolic age. That
is, they see the book of Acts and that time period as a
transitional period containing things that were only for the
initial offering of the gospel and not for all times.
Pentecostals, however, tend to try to go back to the early
apostolic times and try to relive that time. Though I think
this is wrong, I admit that they are truly trying to be
biblical--at least in most cases.
I may accept that many
Pentecostals are truly saved. However, the differences are
of such major import that I cannot accept them and they
could not accept me in fellowship in one church. One side or
the other would have to compromise their heartfelt beliefs.
Yet, denominations are not all bad. They allow these
differences in belief to be aired, argued, and considered. I
am forced to know why I believe what I believe and this is
biblical (1Peter 3:15).
There is yet another benefit
of denominations. They force people like you to consider the
differences and make a commitment on the basis of what you
have concluded. Now I admit that this is not what normally
happens. Most churches are trying so hard to remove any
semblance of distinctive features that they are almost
impossible for the casual observer to see. And most people
are drawn to a particular church for totally unbiblical
reasons--a friend is there, they like the music, the church
is friendly, they have a program for their kids, and so on.
You have an opportunity to
use your initial confusion to ask hard questions and
discover God's truth for yourself. What does this church
believe? How is it different from the church down the
street? What are your biblical reasons for doing what you
do? These and other questions can lead to a discovery of
God's truth--although I admit that many will be baffled that
you would ask such questions. Use the differences to define
the truth. Use them to define your personal convictions and
beliefs. I would like you to have mine, but I have found
that I cannot impress my beliefs and convictions on others.
However, I am convinced that an honest and serious pursuit
of God's truth will bring almost anyone closer to it than
they were before they started. May the Lord guide you as you
seek Him and His truth.
Till He comes,
David F. Reagan