Open the
Bible Question Form to send your own question.
Q:
I was reading 1Timothy 5:9 and was
wondering how many years are threescore years and does this passage mean
the church is not responsible for widows until this age?
A: 1Timothy
5:9 says, "Let not a widow be taken into the number under threescore
years old, having been the wife of one man."
A score is twenty;
threescore is 3 x 20 or sixty. Paul is speaking of one who
is sixty years old.
1Timothy 5:3-16 deals with a
very specific problem Timothy was having in his church in
Ephesus. I have dealt with this in another question I have
answered and have included that text below for you. I think
it will clear up your questions on this issue. Thank you for
writing.
Although the Old Testament
has several admonitions to watch out for the widows, I know
of only three passages in the New Testament that can guide
the churches in dealing with widows. Two of these are in the
context of the Jewish church, but that should not hinder us
getting some guidance from them.
I will start with the last
one. James 1:27 states, "Pure religion and undefiled before
God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and
widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted
from the world." This teaches us to visit the widows in
their affliction and does not address the issue of support.
We will not dwell here.
The key reference for this
subject is 1Timothy 5:3-16. Paul is clearly dealing with an
issue Timothy has had to face. Personally, I can see the
young preacher Timothy being taken in by needy widows who
were not really needy. After one or two were taken in,
others wanted the same benefit and the arguments and hurt
feelings that you would suspect from such conflict began to
hurt the church. In order to avoid unnecessary financial
burden on the church (and possibly on Timothy as well), Paul
set up guidelines for which widows needed to be supported by
the church. As difficult as the guidelines are, it seems
that Paul did not think that this should be done often. Here
is a summary of the qualifications from 1Timothy 5:
1. They are to be destitute
of children or nephews who could take them in or help them
(v.4). If she has family, it is their responsibility to care
for her. Those who will not care for a widowed mother or
aunt are worse than infidels (v.7-8). 2. She is to be known
for a steady and consistent prayer life (v.5) and not be
given to living for pleasure (v.6). 3. She needs to be
over sixty years of age (v.9). 4. She needs to have been
married only once in her lifetime (v.9). Note: the thought
behind these last two points is that younger women and women
who have married before are more likely to marry again
(v.11-12). This also shows that the idea that the widow
indeed who is supported by the church is "taken into the
number" (v.9). Evidently, she is expected to continue her
prayer and service ministry while being supported by the
church. This support is not simply a free ride. 5. She
must have a testimony of ministry during her lifetime
(v.10): bringing up children, lodging strangers, washing the
saints feet (a proof of her spirit of hospitality),
relieving the afflicted, and doing every good work.
When younger widows receive
support, they tend to become idle and busybodies (v.13) and
some turn aside after Satan (v.15). It is better therefore
to encourage the younger widows to remarry and take care of
their household (v.14). Paul closes this passage by
declaring once again the primary responsibility of family
members in the care of widows (v.16). They need to do it so
that the church will not be charged.
If strictly applied, there
are probably few widows that would be taken in by the
church, and that seems to be the purpose of Paul's teaching
on the subject. However, we must remember that Paul is
speaking here of full support for the widows. There would be
other cases where temporary or partial help would not
require such strong prohibitions. In other words, helping a
widow with an occasional utility bill would not require the
same restrictions as providing full support would.
The final passage that deals
with care for the widows is found in Acts 6:1-4. Although
this passage may give us some help in dealing with widows,
we need to be careful not to force these practices on the
New Testament church. Paul in 1Timothy 5 is dealing directly
with the issue of churches supporting widows. The situation
in Acts 6 is quite different. First, the church in Jerusalem
is going through its temporary early stage as a communal
organization. Everyone sold their goods, gave them to the
apostles, and lived off the gifts. This was never required
of the early disciples and it did not last long. It is not a
solid example for present-day church practice. Second, the
assumption that the seven men chosen to care for the widows
are deacons is just that--an assumption. Although these men
may be good examples of deacons, they are not called deacons
and we cannot use them as an authority for what deacons must
do. This church was run by twelve apostles; not a pastor
(though James later seems to take that role). It is not at
this time a solid pattern for church order for today's
churches.
The problem was that the
widows were "neglected in the daily ministration" (Acts
6:1). That means that in the communal operation of the early
church at Jerusalem, there was a daily administering of food
and supplies to the believers. The church was divided into
the Jews who fully held on to their Hebrew heritage (usually
coming from Judaea or Galilee) and those who had taken on
many practices they had learned from the Greek culture of
the time (mostly from other parts of the empire). It is
similar to the distinction today between orthodox and
reformed Jews. The Grecian Jews were considered outsiders by
the Hebrew Jews. Evidently, these prejudices were not erased
by their faith in Christ.
What happened is that the
Greeks saw that their widows were not taken care of while
the Hebrew widows were fully cared for. This caused such a
murmuring among the congregation that the apostles
determined that something must be done. They were concerned
that dealing with such carnal issues would take them away
from the ministry of prayer and the word. Therefore, they
led the church to choose seven godly men to take care of the
problem.
Although there is nothing
wrong with a church deciding to generally follow this
pattern in their own operation, it is not a binding command
for churches today. These men may have been an early stage
of what later became deacons, but they were not the rule for
what deacons do today. That is decided by the individual
church. Paul gives the qualifications of deacons, not their
duties. Evidently, they do what the leadership of the church
determines they need to do. In this, the incident in Acts 6
is a good pattern.
Finally, what is our
responsibility to widows today? We should certainly pray for
them, visit them, encourage them, and help them when they
have special needs. In certain cases, it would be right to
fully support them. However, in this day and age in America,
very few widows are destitute to the level required by Paul.
Fewer still meet spiritual requirements he laid out. But
again, this is not to say that we do not give aid to widows
or others in need. I have made it a general rule of our
church that no member of this church will be allowed to go
without food or be put out on the street. However, since
financial problems are often the working of God to teach us
how to live, I do not attempt to solve their financial
problems. If we do this, we will soon find ourselves paying
for their cable television and meals at O'Charley's. Though
each case must be considered separately, the biblical
guidelines will help us much in approaching this problem and
need.
Till He comes,
David F. Reagan