|
|
Why I Am Not A Charismatic
Open the
Bible Question Form to send your own question.
Q:
Why do you as a church oppose
the charismatic movement?
A : Perhaps I should begin with the things I agree
with the charismatics on. In most cases, they preach the
gospel of Jesus Christ and I am sure that many of the
members in the charismatic churches are saved and on their
way to heaven. As such, they are my brothers and sisters in
Christ. I certainly do not hate them. They are also very
evangelistic and zealous in their outreach. They can be
commended on that. And I think that in most cases they are
very sincere in trying to duplicate New Testament
Christianity. Even if they are wrong in some serious ways,
as I think them to be, God can certainly use them for His
work as He has done with His people throughout the ages. In
addition to these things, most of them are true to the Bible
in many of the doctrines of the faith.
You ask why I reject charismatic doctrine. Probably the
best way to answer this is by giving a list of problems I
have with the doctrine and the practices of the
charismatics. These are simply my reasons. They are not
meant to be a personal attack on those who dearly hold to
them, but perhaps they can be topics of consideration for
those who follow the charismatic teaching.
- Charismatics claim to be continuing the signs and
gifts of the apostles when even the apostles themselves
did not continue to have this power to the end of their
ministry. The case in point is Paul and the gift of
healing. When Jesus healed, He healed "every sickness
and every disease among the people" (Matthew 9:35). Even
after the resurrection and ascension of Christ, the
apostles received those who came to them and "and they
were healed every one" (Acts 5:16). God "wrought special
miracles by the hands of Paul: So that from his body
were brought unto the sick handkerchiefs or aprons, and
the diseases departed from them, and the evil spirits
went out of them" (Acts 19:11-12). Nothing hindered
these men from healing and they were always successful.
But something happened before the end of the ministry of
Paul. He carried a doctor [Luke] around with him on his
journeys. When Timothy, his son in the faith, got sick,
he did not send him an apron but rather gave him a
prescription (1Timothy 5:23). In his last letter, he
plainly stated, "Trophimus have I left at Miletum sick"
(2Timothy 4:20). Why did he not heal him before he left
Trophimus? He evidently could not. He also praised God
for the raising up of Epiphroditus who was sick unto
death declaring that "God had mercy on him" (Philippians
2:25-27). But there is no mention of a healing service.
And, finally, the Apostle Paul asked three times for
deliverance from the thorn in the flesh only to be
refused (2Corinthians 12:7-10). From this, Paul
concluded that he should take pleasure in infirmities in
order to demonstrate the power of God. The charismatics
give a blind eye to this massive change in how God did
his work even before the death of the apostles. There is
a tremendous difference between the early apostolic
period and the later apostolic period. In fact, I and
others like me believe strongly in the healing of the
Lord. However, He heals directly from above and not
through aprons, handkerchiefs, falling shadows, and hems
of garments. He heals through prayer and sometimes
miraculously. But He also uses physicians and
prescriptions. The shift in the New Testament is
obvious.
- Charismatics entirely miss the meaning of the
apostolic sign gifts. First of all, they were given to
the Jewish people of the time because God deals with the
Jews in great times of revelation or deliverance with
signs and wonders. We see them when Moses delivered the
Hebrew people out of Egypt (Exodus 7:3). Jesus and the
apostles also used them to reach out to the Jews. Paul
recognized that "the Jews require a sign" (1Corinthians
1:22). But the signs were not for the believing Jews but
rather for the unbelieving Jews. "Wherefore tongues are
for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that
believe not" (1Corinthians 14:22). As the gospel turned
more and more to the Gentiles, the sign gifts began to
diminish. We see this especially in the ministry of
Paul. But there was a second purpose for the sign gifts.
Jesus came and preached many things that the Jews had
not heard and the apostles continued in this preaching.
Why should the Jewish people believe in the new message
of the gospel? By what authority did Jesus and the
apostles preach this gospel? They needed some proof that
their spoken message was indeed from God. That proof
came in the form of the sign gifts. In Mark 16:16-17,
Jesus named several of the signs that would follow His
preachers. Then, in Mark 16:20, the scripture states,
"And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord
working with them, and confirming the word with signs
following." To confirm means to validate; to prove to be
true. Therefore, the signs gave proof to the spoken
words of the apostles and preachers. However, as the New
Testament began to be completed, there was less and less
need for signs to prove them. The sign gifts were
partial and temporary. The New Testament is with us
forever. And, "when that which is perfect is come, then
that which is in part shall be done away" (1Corinthians
13:10).
- Charismatics tend to exalt personal experience above
the truth of the word of God. Their emphasis tends
toward, "It happened to me," or "I saw it myself,"
instead of "thus saith the Lord." And when they do quote
scripture, they tend to take in out of context. Instead
of seeking the Lord Jesus Christ (as Paul in Philippians
3:10), they tend to seek a wonderful personal
experience.
- Charismatics tend to exalt the Holy Ghost to the
detriment of the Son. We should certainly rejoice in the
work and ministry of God's Holy Spirit. But He is not to
be exalted. According to John 16:13-14, when the Spirit
came, He would not "speak of himself" but would
"glorify" the Son. Therefore, if a people are truly
empowered by the Holy Spirit, they will spend the
greatest part of their energy doing He does-- hat is,
glorifying the Son. Since He does not speak of Himself,
those who spend a lot of time and energy glorifying the
Holy Ghost are not speaking by the influence of the Holy
Ghost.
- Because of their emphasis on experience over
doctrine, charismatics tend to fall more often into
serious false doctrine. I am talking now about the many
fringe groups of the charismatics and some not so
fringe. Some teach that believers become gods. Others
deny the trinity and believe that the Father, Son, and
Holy Ghost are three forms of God. All groups have such
variations, but the experiential emphasis of charismatic
doctrine leaves them without the anchor that keeps them
from such error.
- Many charismatic preachers use their influence to
cheat and misuse the common people who follow them. They
live like kings while the people who support them live
in abject poverty. They put on shows and make promises
in order to fleece the people of money. This is not of
God.
- Charismatic preachers tend to deceive people with a
health and wealth gospel. That is, they preach that
following them will give health and wealth to their
followers. This has been a characteristic of the
charismatic movement from its beginning in the early
1900's. They promise health and wealth in order to get
the wealth of the people. Years ago, when I delivered
milk to homes, I served one poor lady who was almost
blind and had many illnesses. She had me help her get
one of the charismatics on her radio set so she could
hear him. She told me that she had sent him money and
kept trusting that she would be healed as she laid her
hands on the radio set while he preached. But she had
been sick for many years and the healing had not come.
This made me sick at heart then and I still cannot
believe that this kind of cheating people is of God.
I will stop for now but I want to mention that this has
nothing to do with Jesus Christ being the same yesterday,
today, and forever. If that verse can be used to prove
charismatic doctrine, then the apostolic gifts should have
been active for the last 6,000 years. But if you will study
Bible history, you will find that God only used signs and
gifts at certain times in history when He had a special work
to do. That time will come again during the tribulation, but
it is not for now. I believe that many good people are being
misled by the charismatic movement today. I also accept that
many are truly being saved--but I fear where they are being
led after that. I do not say these things in order to make
you angry. This is not a matter of personal anger or malice.
I hope the best for you and for the many others who
sincerely follow charismatic doctrine. But you asked me a
reason of the doctrine that I believe and I felt it was only
right to give you an honest answer. May the Lord bless you
as you seek to follow Him.
Till He comes,
David F. Reagan
|
|
|