A:
Christians
disagree much on the application of the passage in James. Some
reject it as a practice for today. Some try to obey it exactly as
detailed in James and do it only when someone specifically calls for
the
elders of the church. Others go much further than James and make it a
regular part of some sort of healing service. I can only give you the
conclusions I reached a few years ago after studying the issue. Here
is
the passage in question:
James 5:14-15 Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of
the
church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name
of
the Lord: And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall
raise
him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him.
I greatly oppose those who make a mockery of this passage by setting
up
healing lines at healing services and use this passage to support their
actions. As we shall see, this passage does not support the practices
of
healing services. The New Testament church was never commanded to have
such services. However, I have no serious opposition to those who
practice anointing of the sick when they call for the elders of the
church according to the instructions in James. I know that they are just
trying to obey the scriptures. But I personally do not anoint the sick
as
a practice. I believe it was a part of the age of the apostles and
connected with other gifts such as speaking in tongues. The book of James
was written early--during the time of the book of Acts. The changes that
would take place with the completion of the New Testament had not yet
taken place. Let me give you seven reasons I do not anoint with oil.
1. It was a Jewish practice and never mentioned
among the Gentiles. Anointing with oil for the purpose of healing is only mentioned two times
in the Bible--in James 5:14 and in Mark 6:13. Mark 6:13 states "And
they
cast out many devils, and anointed with oil many that were sick, and
healed them." It refers to the time Jesus sent His disciples out
two by
two (v.7)--"And he called unto him the twelve, and began to send
them
forth by two and two; and gave them power over unclean spirits." One
of
His commands is that they go only to the lost sheep of the house of
Israel (see Matthew 10:5-6). Obviously, it was a Jewish practice.
The only other mention of the practice is in the book of James. Although
James has much practical instruction for us, it was written to Jewish
believers. James 1:1 states, "James, a servant of God and of the
Lord
Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting."
The "twelve tribes" refer to the Jewish people. Anointing with
oil for
healing is never mentioned in any other context in the New Testament.
2. It was an early practice that was never
mentioned during the age of
grace. Even speaking in tongues was mentioned much later than
anointing
with oil. We see different practices for the sick in later times. Paul
prayed for the removal of the thorn in the flesh (2Corinthians 12:7-9).
He gave a medical prescription to Timothy (1Timothy 5:23). He often kept
Luke the physician close to him (2Timothy 4:11). And, he had to leave
Trophimus at Miletum sick (2Timothy 4:20). If Paul had to ability to
heal
by anointing with oil, why did he not do so?
Much had changed about how God healed. The early healings were
confirmations that the spoken words of Christ and His apostles were truly
from God. Mark 16:20 says, "And they went forth, and preached every
where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs
following. Amen." Notice that the signs (that is, miracles) were
for the
purpose of confirming the word. For instance, if I came to you and said
that Jesus arose from the dead and you must believe in Him for salvation,
why would you believe me before the New Testament was completed? However,
if I said this and then healed your son from a dreadful disease, what
would you think about my message? This is the purpose of the early signs
and wonders. It was to verify the truth of their words.
3. Anointing with oil used a physical object
(oil) in order to obtain
divine assistance. This kind of practice belongs to the time
of the sign
gifts (see Acts 19:11-12).
4. It provided absolute deliverance from
physical illness as in the
apostolic age. Many do not read the words carefully, but James
states
that "the prayer of faith shall save the sick." This is a promise
of
healing. This means that all who sought the elders and received the
prayer of faith would be healed. Does this seem strange? It should not.
It was standard practice by Christ and the apostles. Jesus went about
"healing every sickness and every disease among the people" (Matthew
9:35). He sent out His apostles with power "to heal all manner of
sickness and all manner of disease" (Matthew 10:1). Even after His
resurrection, the apostles of Christ received sick folks and "healed
every one" (Acts 5:16). It was only later that Paul prayed for
deliverance and was refused (2Corinthians 12:7-9) or had to leave a
co-worker behind because he was sick (2Timothy 4:20). When they first
started, all who came to be healed were healed. God's reputation was
on
the line. Now, God shows us that He sometimes fulfills His will through
sickness.
5. As in apostolic healing, the burden of
success was on the ones doing
the anointing. In James, it is the elders who are called upon
to pray and
it is their prayer that saves the sick. Compare this to the time the
disciples of Jesus could not cast a devil out of a boy (see Matthew
17:19- 0). Jesus did not blame the boy. He scolded the disciples for
their lack of faith. That means that those who claim to heal people today
are at fault when the sick person is not healed. It is not the fault
of
the sick.
6. The practice made use of human mediators
in order to obtain
forgiveness of sins. In James, the elders are to pray for the
sick person
so that his sins may be forgiven. The sick person got forgiven because
someone prayed for them and acted as a mediator for them. But 1Timothy
2:5 tells us that there is only one mediator between God and man and
His
name is Christ Jesus. The apostles were given power to remit sins (John
20:23) but today we go directly to Jesus to receive forgiveness.
7. Today, God heals directly; not through
the hands of men. In Matthew
10:1, Jesus gave his disciples power to heal the sick. That power is
not
given to men today. Again, notice the apostle Paul. In Philippians 2:27,
he thanks God for having mercy on a man called Epiphroditus who was sick
unto death before God healed him. Paul does not mention any sort of
healing service or any power men had to heal the sick. Rather, he praises
God for healing the man directly. That is the way God heals today. We
seek Him in prayer and, if it is His will, He heals the sick person.
I hope I have not given you too much material. This question may seem
simple but it involves many things. That is why good men so often
disagree on how to apply this scripture. I hope that this has been a
help
to you.
Till He comes,
Pastor David Reagan