


 











|
|
Nazarene
Q: In
Matthew 2:23 it says "And he came and dwelt in a city called
Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the
prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene."
I have looked quite thoroughly for this verse in the prophets but
cannot find it. I believe it must be there because I believe the
Spirit of God wrote it. The only instances I can find are the verses
referring to Samson in Judges 13, and a possible reference to being
a Nazarite ('Nezer' in the Hebrew here I believe) in Genesis 49:26 where
Joseph is 'separate' from his brethren.
Can you help any please?
A: Unfortunately,
I have been behind on my email and was not able to get to
this one earlier. However, it is an excellent and important question
and
needs to be answered the best I can. Since it is a difficult passage,
I
will make several extended comments that I hope will be helpful.
1. This is a much-disputed verse. One commentator (Broadus) gives six
historical interpretations and then slightly favors a couple of them
without coming to any real conclusion.
2. The prophecy concerns Jesus being called a Nazarene, not a Nazarite.
The two are different. A Nazarene is one who comes from the town of
Nazareth--the obvious meaning of the text. A Nazarite is one who has
taken the Nazarite vow. Jesus was clearly not a Nazarite. The
restrictions of the Nazarite as seen in Numbers
6:1-8 do not match the
life of Christ. He ate and drank with the Jews (Matthew
11:19) and
touched dead bodies.
3. One way to understand the verse is to consider the statement "which
was spoken by the prophets." Certainly the prophets "spoke" prophecies
that were not recorded in the written word of God. However, in an effort
to give full disclosure, I find 12 other times in Matthew where this
formula (something spoken by a prophets or prophets) is mentioned (see
Matthew 1:22; 2:15, 17; 3:3; 4:14; 8:17; 12:17; 13:35; 21:4; 24:15; 27:9,
35). It seems that all 12 of these quotes
that were spoken by prophets
are also a part of written scripture. Though this might be a technical
way to explain the problem, it does not match the pattern of scripture.
4. However, the plain statement, "He shall be called a Nazarene," is
not
found in the Old Testament. In fact, the city of Nazareth is not
mentioned by name in the Old Testament. Josephus does not even mention
it. It was a mean, little village not thought worthy of mention. And,
when prophecy does associate a place with the Christ, it is Bethlehem
of
Judah and not Nazareth in Galilee (Micah 5:2).
The Jews of the time of
Christ understood the connection of Christ with Bethlehem (Matthew
2:1-6;
John 7:42).
However, it seems that no one expected there to be any connection of
the
Messiah with the town of Nazareth. Nathanael asked, "Can there any
good
thing come out of Nazareth?" (John 1:46).
When the identity of Christ was
in question, the Jews asked, "Shall Christ come out of Galilee?" (John
7:41). The Pharisees, who knew that the Christ was to be born in
Bethlehem, declared, "for out of Galilee ariseth no prophet" (John
7:52).
It does not matter whether the prophets only spoke it or also wrote it
in
scripture, if they were known to declare this prophecy, why did no one
know anything about it? Why was Matthew the only one to ever mention
it?
Notice also, it was not just the declaration of one prophet. This
prophecy had been made by "prophets." At least two and perhaps
more of
the prophets had spoken this. Yet, it seems that no one knew of their
prophecy. What is the answer?
5. This brings me to my conclusion. I believe that the prophecy was a
written one and that it was to be found in several of the prophets.
However, because it came from a play on words, it would have been missed
both by the multitudes and by the scribes and Pharisees. Some prophecies
are written to tell us to expect a certain event. However, some
prophecies cannot be seen until after the event occurs. They are placed
there in order to show us that God knew what He was doing all along.
It
is only by looking back after the fulfillment that we can see the
prophecy. But, in seeing the prophecy and its fulfillment, we see more
clearly the plan and providence of God.
The root for Nazareth is the Hebrew word that is translated "stem" in
(Isaiah 11:1,) which states, "And there
shall come forth a rod out of the
stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots." The stem
here
(the only place the English word occurs in scripture) is the cut off
stump of a tree or a stub. The rod growing from the stem is parallel
to
the Branch growing out of the roots. The rod and the Branch are a
prophecy referring to Jesus Christ. The rod grows out of the stem--the
cut-off portion of the tree--just as Jesus grew up in the town of
Nazareth. The picture is of a tree that has been cut down and is
considered dead. However, out of that stump comes new life in the form
of
a rod or branch. This points to the kingly line of David that had been
cut down so that no one of his line sat on the throne of Israel. It also
points to the spiritually lifeless town of Nazareth.
But Isaiah is only one prophet. Where do the "prophets" come
in? I think
the connection comes in the identity of the Messiah as the Branch. Every
time the Messiah is called the Branch in the Old Testament, God is
pointing out that He grows up out of a dead stem and out of the remaining
roots of a felled tree. In the New Testament, we find that this dead
stump is also a picture of the village of Nazareth. So, how many prophets
use the picture of Christ as the Branch. At least three of them do:
(Isaiah 4:2; 11:1, Jeremiah
23:5; 33:15, and Zechariah
3:8; 6:12.)
This solves the problem of the plural "prophets."
So, how does the connection of Christ with Nazareth fit into the gospel
story? It is very important. He becomes known as "Jesus of Nazareth" and
is called by this name 17 times in the gospels and Acts--even by the
unclean spirits (Mark 1:23-24; Luke
4:33-35.) This title was placed on
the cross by Pilate (John 19:19). It is
the title Jesus used to introduce
Himself to Saul who became the Apostle Paul (Acts
22:8). The early
Christians were even known by their enemies as "the sect of the
Nazarenes" (Acts 24:5).
Nazareth was a little, dirty town. It was treated with contempt by the
exalted Pharisees and the common people alike. Yet, it was the soil,
perhaps we should say the stem, out of which Christ grew. His enemies
associated Him with this city as a slur. He wore the title as an
honorable badge. Truly, the prophets did say, "He shall be called
a
Nazarene."
Till He comes,
Pastor David Reagan
For More Information See:
More Questions and Answers
Open the Bible
Question Form to send your own question.

Send Page To a Friend
|