Open the
Bible Question Form to send your own question.
Q:
How does the practice of "Urim
and Thummin" in the Old Testament differ from
forbidden practices of divination?
A
: We
do not totally understand how Urim and Thummin worked in the Bible. We
know they were objects that fit into a pouch of the breastplate worn
by
the high priest (Exodus 28:30; Leviticus
8:8). We also know that they
were a way to ask counsel of the Lord (Numbers
27:21). Their use was
restricted to the priest. After the return from Babylonian captivity,
some priests who had a questionable genealogy had to wait for a priest
with Urim and Thummin in order to determine their ancestry (Ezra
2:63; Nehemiah 7:65). We do not know if that
priest ever showed up.
Other references speak of the ephod and indicate it included a way to
get
counsel from the Lord (1Samuel 23:6-12; 30:7-8).
It is very likely that
the ephod had the Urim and Thummin with it. Other examples of revelation
that probably came by way of Urim and Thummin are the idetifying of Achan
(Joshua 7:16-20) and the refusal of God
to answer Saul (1Samuel 14:36-37;
28:6).
You question about distinguishing Urim and Thummin from
forbidden
practices of divination is difficult because of our ignorance on how
it
worked. I used to think that it was just some way to get yes and no
answers from God until I realized that some of the answers they received
were not yes and no answers. God could also refuse to answer by Urim
and
Thummin. The main distinctions I see is that the Urim and Thummin was
established by God to be used only by the priest and that its counsel
had
the same authority as other forms of revelation--it was always absolutely
true. In contrast, any form of divination established by man is an
abomination to the Lord (Deuteronomy 18:10; 2Kings
17:17; Acts 16:16).
Till He comes,
Pastor David Reagan