Open the
Bible Question Form to send your own question.
Editor’s
Note: This is taken from History of the Christian Church:
Volume 2 (p.201-205) by Philip Schaff. Although some of
Schaff’s doctrinal stands are wrong, he was an excellent
historian. Those who want the actual documents and
quotations alluded to here will find them listed in the
footnotes of this section of the book. For ease of reading,
only portions of the chapter are used here. However, the
wording has not been changed (unless by accident).
The
celebration of the Lord’s Day in memory of the resurrection
of Christ dates undoubtedly from the apostolic age. Nothing
short of apostolic precedent can account for the universal
religious observance in the churches of the second century.
There is no dissenting voice. This custom is confirmed by
the testimonies of the earliest post-apostolic writers, as
Barnabas, Ignatius, and Justin Martyr. It is also confirmed
by the younger Pliny. The Didache calls the first day
“the Lord’s Day of the Lord.”…
The fathers
did not regard the Christian Sunday as a continuation of,
but as a substitute for, the Jewish Sabbath, and based it
not so much on the fourth commandment, and the primitive
rest of God in creation, as upon the resurrection of Christ
and the apostolic tradition. There was a disposition to
disparage the Jewish law in the zeal to prove the
independent originality of Christian institutions… Sunday
was always regarded in the ancient church as a divine
institution, at least in the secondary sense, as distinct
from divine ordinances in the primary sense, which were
directly and positively commanded by Christ, as baptism and
the Lord’s Supper. Regular public worship absolutely
requires a stated day of worship.
Ignatius
was the first who contrasted Sunday with the Jewish Sabbath
as something done away with. So did the author of the
so-called Epistle of Barnabas. Justin Martyr, in controversy
with a Jew, says that the pious before Moses pleased God
without circumcision and the Sabbath, and that Christianity
requires not one particular Sabbath, but a perpetual
Sabbath. He assigns as a reason for the selection of the
first day for the purposes of Christian worship, because on
that day God dispelled the darkness and the chaos, and
because Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to his
assembled disciples…
Dionysius
of Corinth mentions Sunday incidentally in a letter to the
church of Rome, A.D., 170: “Today we kept the Lord’s Day
holy, in which we read your letter.” Melito of Sardis wrote
a treatise on the Lord’s Day, which is lost. Irenaeus of
Lyons, about 170, bears testimony to the celebration of the
Lord’s Day, but likewise regards the Jewish Sabbath merely
as a symbolical and typical ordinance, and says that
“Abraham without circumcision and without observance of
Sabbaths believed in God,” which proves “the symbolical and
temporary character of those ordinances, and their inability
to make perfect.” Tertullian, at the close of the second and
beginning of the third century, views the Lord’s Day as
figurative of rest from sin and typical of man’s final rest,
and says: “We have nothing to do with Sabbaths, new moons or
the Jewish festivals, much less with those of the heathen.
We have our solemnities, the Lord’s Day, for instance, and
Pentecost…
We see then
that the ante-Nicean church clearly distinguished the
Christian Sunday from the Jewish Sabbath, and put it on
independent Christian ground… She regarded Sunday as a
sacred day, as the Day of the Lord, as the weekly
commemoration of his resurrection and the Pentecostal
effusion of the Spirit, and therefore as a day of holy joy
and thanksgiving to be celebrated even before the rising of
the sun by prayer, praise, and communion with the risen Lord
and Saviour.